![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
borislvinThe State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public sector employees violates the First Amendment. Abood erred in concluding otherwise, and stare decisis cannot support it. Abood is therefore overruled.
<...>
For these reasons, States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. The First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.
<...>
Abood was wrongly decided and is now overruled.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1466_2b3j.pdf
Уже ради одного этого... и т.д. :)
<...>
For these reasons, States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. The First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.
<...>
Abood was wrongly decided and is now overruled.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1466_2b3j.pdf
Уже ради одного этого... и т.д. :)
