individuals of the undesirable type
Feb. 21st, 2022 02:15 amNicholas Murray Butler (April 2, 1862 – December 7, 1947) was an American philosopher, diplomat, and educator. Butler was president of Columbia University, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, and the deceased James S. Sherman's replacement as William Howard Taft's running mate in the 1912 United States presidential election. He became so well known and respected that The New York Times printed his Christmas greeting to the nation every year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Murray_Butler
***************************
Butler wanted to reduce the number of New Yorkers who attended Columbia College, because New York City students were disproportionately from immigrant families and Jewish. In order to attract larger numbers of young Episcopalian gentlemen, the future leaders of the country, Butler made an effort to nationalize the College, that is, to draw students from outside New York City. Whereas before 1910 the prevailing view in higher education had been that qualified students should not be turned away, Butler helped to develop the notion of "selective admission", whereby a college conveyed its distinction and prestige by turning away qualified students. Application forms were modified in 1919 to inquire about family history; the forms asked not only for the candidate's place of birth, but his religion, his father's place of birth and his father's occupation. The application also required a photograph of the applicant and an interview.
This change in admissions policies produced the desired effect. From 1920 to 1930, that is the first decade of the new admissions policy, the percentage of Columbia students coming from New York City dropped from 54 percent to 23 percent, and what one administrator called "the invasion of the Jewish student" was contained. Dean of the College Herbert E. Hawkes informed Yale's director of admissions in 1930 that "the proportion of Jews in Columbia has been reduced from about 40 percent to 20 percent." But the issue of selectivity, of who should be admitted to Columbia, persisted. In 1933 President Butler instructed Dean Hawkes: "I don't know whether it is at all practicable, but it would be highly judicious if ... some way could be found to see to it that individuals of the undesirable type did not get in Columbia College, no matter what their record in the very important matter of As and Bs."
https://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan02/jan02_cover_architecture.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Murray_Butler
***************************
Butler wanted to reduce the number of New Yorkers who attended Columbia College, because New York City students were disproportionately from immigrant families and Jewish. In order to attract larger numbers of young Episcopalian gentlemen, the future leaders of the country, Butler made an effort to nationalize the College, that is, to draw students from outside New York City. Whereas before 1910 the prevailing view in higher education had been that qualified students should not be turned away, Butler helped to develop the notion of "selective admission", whereby a college conveyed its distinction and prestige by turning away qualified students. Application forms were modified in 1919 to inquire about family history; the forms asked not only for the candidate's place of birth, but his religion, his father's place of birth and his father's occupation. The application also required a photograph of the applicant and an interview.
This change in admissions policies produced the desired effect. From 1920 to 1930, that is the first decade of the new admissions policy, the percentage of Columbia students coming from New York City dropped from 54 percent to 23 percent, and what one administrator called "the invasion of the Jewish student" was contained. Dean of the College Herbert E. Hawkes informed Yale's director of admissions in 1930 that "the proportion of Jews in Columbia has been reduced from about 40 percent to 20 percent." But the issue of selectivity, of who should be admitted to Columbia, persisted. In 1933 President Butler instructed Dean Hawkes: "I don't know whether it is at all practicable, but it would be highly judicious if ... some way could be found to see to it that individuals of the undesirable type did not get in Columbia College, no matter what their record in the very important matter of As and Bs."
https://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan02/jan02_cover_architecture.html
no subject
Date: 2022-02-21 06:05 pm (UTC)Ведь мы точно знаем, что республиканцы так не делают:
>> Они могут вести себя "правым" образом. То есть транслировать свои симпатии и предпочтения в собственное поведение, за свой собственный счет. Например, принципиально сдавать свою квартиру исключительно лицам категории Икс. Или, скажем, субсидировать аренду квартир лицам категории Икс. Мол, если вы сдадите им квартиру по рыночным расценкам, мы будем доплачивать вам еще 50 процентов сверху. Или выписывать таким несознательным квартировладельцам от своего имени страховку на случай поломок и чего-нибудь в этом роде.
>> Другой вариант - "левый". Это когда они удовлетворяют свои желания, симпатии, антипатии и предпочтения за чужой счет. Например, им не нравятся чужие объявления - и они их срывают (как это делал покойный Алик Суханов "Такинет", искренне считавший себя большим либералом) или просто запрещают. То есть проводят свою личную цензуру. Или, того хуже, выискивают способ напустить на квартировладельцев, придерживающихся неправильных взглядов, государственный аппарат, с прокурорами и полицией.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 10:51 am (UTC)Так он вёл себя "правым" образом: колледж то частным был.
Именно поэтому евреям в США жилось гораздо лучше чем в совке, несмотря на то что было много антисемитов: у любого была возможность пойти в другой, независимый от антисемитов, ВУЗ или бизнес, или открыть свой.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 01:35 pm (UTC)(Не говоря уж о твиттерах. Основать новый твиттер много легче, чем Коламбию.)
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 02:27 pm (UTC)да и твиттер защищен в рамках того же права, как частная корпорация.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 02:40 pm (UTC)соц.-сети специальным законом конгресса защищены, которым например СМИ не защищены, СМИ отвечают за то что у них опубликовано, a соц.-сети нeт.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 08:01 pm (UTC)И это мнение вы предлагаете энфорсить на частные лица с помощью государства, правильно?
то есть, я подскажу, вы предлагаете "левый" путь из классификации выше?
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 08:27 pm (UTC)Но да, "правый" путь был бы не иметь вообще гос.дотаций/гос.грантов. Но если уж они есть и такие левые порядки установлены, то должны хотя бы нe дискриминиpoвaть граждан.
no subject
Date: 2022-02-22 09:13 pm (UTC)