Правильное отношение к ученым степеням

[borislvin]

По ссылке в ЖЖ юзера dmtr обнаружен новый юзер romanycz. А на одной из личных страниц этого замечательного юзера выложено его формальное CV (http://www.isi.it/~zapatrin/cvs.htm), где имеется, среди прочего, раздел "Academic degrees". Раздел выглядит так:

Academic degrees

I do not recognize the notion of academic degree and do not collaborate with institutions discriminating people by this formal criterion.

Comment: If your institution conducts the above mentioned discriminating policy, please throw away all my papers and stop considering any collaboration with me. In fact, I have a sheet of paper (called the diploma of candidate of physico-mathematical sciences obtained offically without a supervisor) which Russian scientists usually refer to as Ph. D. However I use it only in Russia and only for such kind of official bodies which, from my point of view, simply should not exist.

Четко и ясно. Согласен на сто процентов с каждым словом (с той маленькой разницей, что у меня нет даже и такой sheet of paper).

Comments

Why not?

[(Anonymous)]

Ne poimu ja Vas rebjata... Nu napisal chelovek neplohoe resume. Izlohil svoju tochku zrenija... Kstati neploho izlozhil.. Pochemu ze eto Vas zadevaet?? Esli v resume ne "vyebyvat'sa", to kakoe eto nahui resume (sorry for coarse language). Eto po-opredeleniu delaut vse, i esli napisat' skromno, to vsjak podumaet chto cheloveku pisat' to ne o chem... Ja ne nashel nichego porochaschego v etom resume, ni systemy, ni dazhe samu "bumazhku", prosto tochka zrenija.. Pardon za latinitzu - nu net u menja Cyrillic keyboard. Igor

Re: Why not?

[bbb.livejournal.com]

Именно.